Assignment #9

1. Wikki allows anyone and everyone to edit, comment, and do whatever they would like to it.
Scholarpedia, allows you to do the same but, the original author is a scholar and when you edit it a scholar or a peer editor looks over it so nothing is fake on there. I have used wikki before but not scholarpedia, in the future i will use scholarpedia.
2. I think its intresting how anyone can just edit that information. I think its hard to trust.
3. I would use scholarpedia over wikkipedia for research. I would use it for a paper or a presentation on someone because you can get a lot of information that is accurate on scholarpedia right there on their website!